Greetings, traveler!
A tab bar is often the backbone of a SwiftUI application. It defines the primary navigation model, sets expectations for the app’s hierarchy, and frames how different sections relate to each other. Yet as a project grows, the tab-bar configuration tends to suffer from the same issue most large SwiftUI views do: it slowly expands into an oversized, difficult-to-read block of code.
A three-tab layout becomes five tabs. Role-based screens appear. Feature flags introduce branching logic. Before long, what was once a clean TabView turns into a dense configuration section embedded inside the app’s main container.
This article discusses how to keep tab-related code manageable using an approach based on a @TabContentBuilder — a pattern that moves tab configuration out of the primary view and into a dedicated, composable definition.
The Problem with Inline TabView Configuration
A typical SwiftUI TabView starts simple:
TabView {
Tab(
DemoTab.home.title,
systemImage: DemoTab.home.systemImage,
value: .home
) {
HomeView()
}
Tab(
DemoTab.search.title,
systemImage: DemoTab.search.systemImage,
value: .search,
role: .search
) {
SearchView()
}
}It is clear and easy to follow — until real-world requirements arrive:
- Each screen evolves and gains its own navigation stacks.
- Tab labels grow configurable (titles, icons, accessibility).
- Some tabs must appear only in certain states (e.g. logged-in user).
- Tag values must match the type used for programmatic selection.
- Teams add stylistic conventions, wrapper modifiers, analytics hooks.
In medium to large projects, the tab bar often ends up mixing:
- screen definitions
- display logic
- conditional checks
- tags
- modifiers
- environment data
all inside a single TabView block.
This bloats the view hierarchy and makes navigation harder to maintain or extend.
Decoupling Tab Definitions Improves Maintainability
One way to bring order to the tab-bar configuration is to treat it as a separate concern: not part of the layout body, but as its own unit of structure.
This is the idea behind using a @TabContentBuilder. Instead of embedding tabs inline, you extract them into a dedicated builder that returns a collection describing your tab items.
The goal is simple:
- keep navigation definition out of the main layout,
- allow tab listings to scale,
- support conditional or dynamic tabs,
Introducing @TabContentBuilder
A @TabContentBuilder works similarly to a toolbar builder or menu builder: it combines multiple items into a single representation consumed by TabView.
Here is how a container view might look when using this pattern:
struct DemoContentView: View {
@State private var selection: DemoTab = .home
var body: some View {
TabView(selection: $selection) {
tabs
}
}
@TabContentBuilder<DemoTab>
private var tabs: some TabContent<DemoTab> {
homeTab
settingsTab
searchTab
}
private var homeTab: some TabContent<DemoTab> {
Tab(
DemoTab.home.title,
systemImage: DemoTab.home.systemImage,
value: .home
) {
HomeView()
}
}
private var settingsTab: some TabContent<DemoTab> {
Tab(
DemoTab.settings.title,
systemImage: DemoTab.settings.systemImage,
value: .settings
) {
SettingsView()
}
}
private var searchTab: some TabContent<DemoTab> {
Tab(
DemoTab.search.title,
systemImage: DemoTab.search.systemImage,
value: .search,
role: .search
) {
SearchView()
}
}
}Key benefits:
- The body stays focused on structure, not configuration.
- Tabs live in one place.
- Conditional tabs fit naturally inside the builder.
- Strong type relationships remain intact (selection type – tab values).
The result is a more predictable and scalable navigation definition.
Note
By the way, there’s another way to organize a view’s structure – @ToolbarContentBuilder. Check out the full article about it.
Conclusion
Organizing tab-bar configuration is one of those improvements that pays off the moment the project grows beyond a prototype. Moving tab definitions into a @TabContentBuilder keeps the body of your main container view concise, improves readability, and gives your navigation model a dedicated home.
